In the Spotlight

Tools
News & Features




State by State Loopholes - Southwest States

STATE

SCORE

RANK

LOOPHOLES



Arizona

91 5 · lawmakers do not have to disclose a value range of employment earnings

· lawmakers do not have to disclose the names of clients

· lawmakers do not have to disclose a value range of earnings from clients



California

81 12 · lawmakers do not have to disclose dependents' employment/employer information

· lawmakers do not have to disclose spouse's officer/directorship positions

· lawmakers do not have to disclose dependents' officer/directorship positions

· lawmakers do not have to disclose a value range of earnings from clients

· lawmakers do not have to disclose dependents' clients

· lawmakers do not have to disclose spouse's name

· lawmakers do not have to disclose dependents' names

Colorado 76 16 · lawmakers may file updates rather than a complete accounting of private business activities and interests

· copy costs are .50 per page or higher

· lawmakers do not have to disclose a value range of employment earnings

· lawmakers do not have to disclose a value range of investments

· lawmakers do not have to disclose a value range of real property holdings

· lawmakers do not have to disclose any client information for self or immediate family for self or immediate family

· lawmakers do not have to disclose spouse's name

· lawmakers do not have to disclose dependents' names

Nevada 56.5 27 · lawmakers do not have to disclose a value range of employment earnings

· lawmakers do not have to disclose a value range of investments

· lawmakers do not have to disclose a value range of real property holdings

· lawmakers do not have to disclose officer/director positions held by self or immediate family

· lawmakers do not have to disclose any client information for self or immediate family for self or immediate family

· lawmakers do not have to disclose spouse's name

· lawmakers do not have to disclose dependents' names

New Mexico 60.5 25 · if a lawmaker declares a conflict before a vote, it is difficult to find that information in the House journal

· lawmakers do not have to disclose a value range of employment earnings

· lawmakers do not have to disclose dependents' employment/employer information

· lawmakers only have to disclose investment information as it is narrowly defined

· lawmakers do not have to disclose a value range of investments

· lawmakers do not have to disclose dependents' investments

· lawmakers do not have to disclose a value range of real property holdings

· lawmakers do not have to disclose dependents' real property holdings

· lawmakers do not have to disclose dependents' officer/directorship positions

· lawmakers do not have to disclose any client information for self or immediate family for self or immediate family

· lawmakers do not have to disclose spouse's name

· lawmakers do not have to disclose dependents' names

Utah 1 49 · lawmakers do not have to disclose private business activities or interests in Utah unless they consider it a conflict of interest


Hidden Agendas Home | Overview | The Case of Roy Ray: Conflict or Not?
The Story of Dallas Sams | Complete CPI Report



">