 |
|
Running since June 11, 1999
|
Here are the up-to-the second results
of our survey! If you came from the survey
page, your responses have been included. Now that you've voted, put your full opinion on the record in the MPR Online Forum. |
|
| 1. I favor St. Paul's plan for a combination city sales-tax and state funding as the major components for a new Twins stadium. |
 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| 10.0% | 9.27 | 4.83 | 10.0 | 65.7 |
| 2. I favor Minneapolis' idea of a Hennepin County tax with no state funding for a new Twins stadium. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 12% | 8.4 | 12.4 | 16.4 | 50.8 |
| 3. No matter what public sentiment is, I believe -eventually- there will be a publicly-financed baseball stadium in Minnesota. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 15.2% | 29.3 | 16.8 | 18.8 | 19.6 |
| 4. Given the choice, the Twins should get a new stadium before the Vikings do. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 14.9% | 11.6 | 34.2 | 9.67 | 29.4 |
| 5. Given the choice, I'd rather the Twins get a new stadium by whatever means rather than have them move. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 15.2% | 4.41 | 13.6 | 15.2 | 51.4 |
| 6. Given the choice, I'd rather the Vikings get a new stadium by whatever means rather than have them move |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 10.4% | 8.83 | 16.4 | 17.2 | 46.9 |
© 2024 | Home : Terms of Use : Your Privacy RightsRadio Listening : News & Features : Events Calendar : Your Voice : About Us