In the Spotlight

News & Features
Go to Session 2004
DocumentSession 2004
DocumentFinance and taxes
DocumentHealth Care
DocumentPublic Safety
DocumentSocial Issues
DocumentSocial Services
DocumentStadium Issues
More from MPR
Your Voice
DocumentJoin the conversation with other MPR listeners in the News Forum.

DocumentE-mail this pageDocumentPrint this page
Revolt is brewing over No Child Left Behind
Larger view
Sen. Leroy Stumpf is sponsoring a largely symbolic resolution that asks Congress to waive all requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act in Minnesota. (MPR Photo/Tim Pugmire)
A revolt against federal education law is brewing at the state Capitol. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 brought tough new accountability measures to schools and expanded student testing requirements. But several state lawmakers in both political parties are growing frustrated with what they view as an unfunded and intrusive mandate. The Senate Education Committee will take up two bills Tuesday that express that frustration.

St. Paul, Minn. — The No Child Left Behind law's underlying goal, closing the achievement gap between students of color and their white classmates, is widely applauded. The growing criticism, however, hinges on its unprecedented requirements for student testing, teacher training and accountability.

Sen. Leroy Stumpf, DFL-Thief River Falls, chairs the Senate Education Budget Division. He says complying with the federal law is simply too expensive, particularly when the state has no extra money.

"There has to be some greater flexibility on the part of these regulations that are being sent to us from the federal government, when states are financially strapped," says Stumpf.

Larger view
Image Sen. Michele Bachmann

Stumpf is sponsoring a largely symbolic resolution that asks Congress to waive all requirements of the law in Minnesota. Virginia is one of a handful of other states where lawmakers have passed similar resolutions. Utah is considering whether to forgo the federal funds linked to the law. Stumpf says he wants Minnesota exempted from the law, but he doesn't want to lose millions of dollars in federal aid.

"If the federal government would acknowledge that Minnesota is doing an excellent job in education, and would waive those requirements, we would go and continue to do an excellent job in education, because we believe in it. And we'd even have many improvements we could make and afford," says Stumpf.

Liberal and conservative legislators are lining up against No Child Left Behind. Sen. Michele Bachmann, R-Stillwater, has introduced a bill to cut all ties with the law and give up the money. Bachmann says many states are spending far more to implement the law than they receive in federal education funding. She also sees the requirements as a threat to the local control of schools.

"We really have a pretty good understanding on how to deal with education in Minnesota," Bachmann says. "I would prefer to see those decisions made here locally and within our state on education, and not hand over the reins of decision-making authority to the federal government."

Larger view
Image Commissioner Yecke

A legislative auditor's report is expected early next month that will detail the state cost of No Child Left Behind.

Versions of the Stumpf and Bachmann bills have also been introduced in the House. But a key committee leader there appears less anxious to take up the debate. Rep. Barb Sykora, R-Excelsior, chairwoman of the House Education Policy Committee, says the state must help under-performing students.

"I don't like federal intrusion. On the other hand, I think they found something we weren't doing very well," says Sykora. "In the aggregate, we looked great. When you start to break it down, we were losing a lot of students."

Gov. Pawlenty has made No Child Left Behind a priority in his education agenda. His education commissioner, Cheri Pierson Yecke, says she's trying to work with the federal government to iron out any implementation problems.

For example, she says Minnesota has far fewer schools listed as not making "adequate yearly progress," because of flexibility approved by federal officials. Yecke says she doesn't want to give up on what she believes in a good law.

"If educators look at the tenets that support No Child Left Behind, the goals of No Child Left Behind are the goals of public education," says Yecke. "We don't want to see children falling through the cracks. It's the implementation that is challenging."

Yecke says she'll continue to push for more flexibility when she meets with U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige on Wednesday, when he visits Minnesota. She says the secretary's visit will include a private meeting with school superintendents to discuss the challenges of No Child Left Behind.

Respond to this story
News Headlines
Related Subjects